Boston vs Los Angeles: cost of living compared
Los Angeles is 8% more expensive than Boston overall. State income tax tops out around 5% in MA vs 9.3% in CA.
Indexes use a US average of 100: below 100 is cheaper than the national average. Housing and transportation are derived from median home prices, rents and commute times; figures come from BLS, Census ACS, Numbeo and the MIT Living Wage Calculator.
The big picture
Moving between Boston and Los Angeles involves a significant shift in living expenses. Overall, Los Angeles presents a higher cost of living compared to Boston. This difference is primarily driven by housing expenses, which are notably higher in Los Angeles, though other categories also contribute to the gap. Understanding these distinctions is key to budgeting for a move between these major metropolitan areas.
Housing
While both metros have very high housing costs, Los Angeles generally has more expensive homes for purchase than Boston. However, for those looking to rent a smaller apartment, Boston can be noticeably more expensive. Boston's housing stock often includes older, multi-family structures, while Los Angeles features a mix of single-family homes and larger apartment complexes. Property taxes and insurance costs will also vary significantly between the two regions.
Taxes and everyday costs
Daily expenses show some variation. Los Angeles has a higher state income tax burden compared to Boston. Transportation costs are also higher in Los Angeles, reflecting a greater reliance on personal vehicles. Food expenses are roughly similar, with Boston being slightly higher. Healthcare costs are comparable, while utilities are somewhat more expensive in Boston. These factors combine to influence the overall daily spending required in each city.
Lifestyle trade-offs
The lifestyle differences are pronounced. Boston experiences distinct four seasons, including cold winters and humid summers, while Los Angeles enjoys a consistently mild, Mediterranean climate. Getting around Boston often involves a well-developed public transit system and walking, whereas Los Angeles typically requires more driving. Boston generally feels more compact and historic, while Los Angeles is more sprawling. Both metros offer diverse cultural and recreational opportunities.
Bottom line
A household budget will stretch further in Boston than in Los Angeles, primarily due to the overall higher cost of living in the Californian city. While some expenses like smaller apartment rents might be lower in Los Angeles, the combined impact of higher home prices, transportation costs, and state income tax means a move to Los Angeles generally entails a more substantial financial commitment. Consider where your biggest expenses lie when weighing your options.
| Measure | Boston, MA | Los Angeles, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living (US avg = 100) | 162 | 175 |
| Housing index | 194 | 201 |
| Transportation index | 121 | 129 |
| Food index | 115 | 112 |
| Healthcare index | 118 | 118 |
| Utilities index | 135 | 128 |
| Misc index | 122 | 118 |
| Median home price | $698,000 | $795,000 |
| Median 1-bedroom rent | $2,850/mo | $2,400/mo |
| Average commute | 32 min | 34 min |
Compare any two metros with the free cost of living tool, or see the true monthly cost of a specific Los Angeles home with the True Cost Calculator.