Buffalo vs Minneapolis: cost of living compared

Minneapolis is 32% more expensive than Buffalo overall. State income tax tops out around 6.5% in NY vs 7.05% in MN.

Indexes use a US average of 100: below 100 is cheaper than the national average. Housing and transportation are derived from median home prices, rents and commute times; figures come from BLS, Census ACS, Numbeo and the MIT Living Wage Calculator.

The big picture

Comparing the overall cost of living, Buffalo is noticeably more affordable than Minneapolis. This difference is primarily driven by housing expenses, which are substantially lower in Buffalo. While other categories like transportation, food, and healthcare also show Buffalo as more economical, the significant gap in housing costs is the main factor contributing to Buffalo's lower overall index. Minneapolis, in contrast, generally aligns closer to or above the national average for most spending categories.

Housing

Housing costs represent the largest financial difference between these two metros. Both median home prices and typical one-bedroom rents are considerably lower in Buffalo. Minneapolis's housing market is notably more expensive for both buying and renting. While specific property taxes and insurance vary, the initial outlay for a home or monthly rent will be substantially less in Buffalo, impacting long-term ownership costs and immediate rental budgets.

Taxes and everyday costs

Daily expenses generally favor Buffalo. State income tax rates are roughly similar, though slightly lower in New York. Transportation costs are more economical in Buffalo, and daily commutes are typically shorter. Food and healthcare expenses are also lower in Buffalo, while utility costs are quite similar in both metros, though slightly less in Buffalo. This means everyday spending on essentials will generally be more manageable in Buffalo.

Lifestyle trade-offs

Beyond costs, movers will notice distinct differences. Both metros experience cold, snowy winters, but Minneapolis often sees more extreme temperatures. Buffalo, situated on a Great Lake, experiences lake-effect snow. Minneapolis offers a more extensive public transit system and a denser urban core, while Buffalo's pace is generally more relaxed, with a greater reliance on personal vehicles. Both offer access to natural beauty, but their urban character differs.

Bottom line

For households prioritizing affordability, Buffalo presents a clear advantage across most spending categories, especially housing. A move to Buffalo would likely result in a much lower overall household budget compared to Minneapolis. While Minneapolis offers a slightly more robust public transit and a larger urban feel, the financial savings in Buffalo, particularly on housing, transportation, and daily essentials, are substantial and would significantly impact a household's financial outlook.

Compare any two metros with the free cost of living tool, or see the true monthly cost of a specific Minneapolis home with the True Cost Calculator.

More comparisons

• Minneapolis vs Buffalo cost of living
• New York vs Minneapolis cost of living
• Los Angeles vs Minneapolis cost of living
• Chicago vs Minneapolis cost of living
• Dallas vs Minneapolis cost of living
• Houston vs Minneapolis cost of living
• Washington vs Minneapolis cost of living