Minneapolis vs Riverside: cost of living compared

Riverside is 9% more expensive than Minneapolis overall. State income tax tops out around 7.05% in MN vs 9.3% in CA.

Indexes use a US average of 100: below 100 is cheaper than the national average. Housing and transportation are derived from median home prices, rents and commute times; figures come from BLS, Census ACS, Numbeo and the MIT Living Wage Calculator.

The big picture

Overall, the cost of living in Minneapolis is noticeably lower than in Riverside. This difference is primarily driven by the significantly higher housing costs found in Riverside. While other categories also show Riverside as more expensive, the gap in housing expenses is the most substantial factor influencing the overall budget for residents considering a move between these two metropolitan areas.

Housing

Housing costs present a major contrast, with both median home prices and typical one-bedroom rents being considerably higher in Riverside. Minneapolis offers a more affordable housing market, featuring a mix of historic and modern homes, often with distinct seasonal considerations for maintenance. Riverside's housing stock tends to reflect a more car-centric, suburban Southern California style, with associated property taxes and insurance costs that can also be higher.

Taxes and everyday costs

Daily expenses for transportation, food, healthcare, and utilities are all generally higher in Riverside compared to Minneapolis. Additionally, California's state income tax is noticeably higher than Minnesota's, impacting take-home pay. This means that beyond housing, a household's regular spending on necessities and their overall tax burden will be greater when living in Riverside.

Lifestyle trade-offs

Minneapolis experiences four distinct seasons, including cold, snowy winters, while Riverside offers a drier, Mediterranean climate with hot summers and mild winters. Getting around Minneapolis often involves a mix of driving, public transit, and biking, with a more compact urban core. Riverside's layout is more sprawling, making personal vehicle use more prevalent, and commutes are typically longer than in Minneapolis.

Bottom line

For those weighing a move, the financial implications are clear: Minneapolis generally offers a more budget-friendly environment across most spending categories. The most significant savings would be realized in housing, whether buying or renting. While both metros offer unique lifestyles and amenities, a household's budget will stretch further in Minneapolis, especially considering the differences in housing and state income tax.

Compare any two metros with the free cost of living tool, or see the true monthly cost of a specific Riverside home with the True Cost Calculator.

More comparisons

• Riverside vs Minneapolis cost of living
• New York vs Riverside cost of living
• Los Angeles vs Riverside cost of living
• Chicago vs Riverside cost of living
• Dallas vs Riverside cost of living
• Houston vs Riverside cost of living
• Washington vs Riverside cost of living